Home > FIND RESOURCES > Elements of Effective Practice >
Recently revised and updated, The Elements of Effective Practice reflects the latest in quality mentoring research, policies, and practices.
(This project was funded by a generous grant from the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation.)
As a strategy for helping young people succeed in life, mentoring works. It helps give young people the confidence, resources, and skills they need to reach their potential.
But like any youth-development strategy, mentoring works best when measures are taken to ensure quality and effectiveness. The risks and improvements to the young person are proportional to how long the relationship endures. The longer a relationship lasts, usually the closer the bond and the greater benefit to the youth.
The guidelines presented here are geared toward helping mentoring relationships thrive and endure. They include measures any mentoring program can implement to offer the best mentoring possible—mentoring that does everything in its power to help young people and keep them from harm's way. These guidelines are based on solid research—research that affirms the importance of accountability and responsibility in meeting young people's needs. And, they are based on experience; the first Elements of Effective Practice were developed and published in 1990 by a national panel of mentoring experts brought together by MENTOR and United Way of America. For more than a decade, those Elements have served as the gold standard for mentoring.
These new guidelines are the culmination of a process that, once again, brought together many of the nation's foremost authorities on mentoring. In 2003, this newly formed group began by reassessing the existing Elements. They took the best of those Elements and added new ideas and new practices that reflect the latest in mentoring policies, practices, experiences, and research.
If you already have a mentoring program in place, use these guidelines to help you improve your current practices. Or, use them as a benchmark for determining how your program is doing and for fine-tuning your practices.
If you are considering initiating a mentoring effort, you will want to first conduct an assessment of local needs and the assets your organization already has to meet them. Or, you might conduct an environmental scan, a process that identifies community and state priorities, needs and opportunities in the context of the economic environment. These tools help ensure your proposed initiative is an appropriate response to an identified youth need. You will also need to confirm that people are ready and willing to invest in your program and that demand and support for your program services will be ongoing. Further, your needs assessment should help you determine whether individuals and organizations — such as, schools, faith communities and volunteers — are willing and able to refer youth and/or provide mentors, and should confirm that your organization has the capacity, commitment and capability to run a quality mentoring program.
By following these guidelines, you can be sure you will be doing your utmost to ensure that mentoring does, in fact, work for America's young people by providing the best mentoring experience possible. For ease of use, these comprehensive guidelines are divided into four sections:
The Program Design and Planning section includes comprehensive guidelines you can use to launch an effective new mentoring initiative. Under the Program Management and Program Operations sections, you will find guidelines for managing and implementing the many elements of your program if your program is new, or fine-tuning certain elements if you have an established program. The fourth section — Program Evaluation — guides you in analyzing your program to ensure it is safe, effective and able to meet the goals you have set.
Design the parameters for the program:
Plan how the program will be managed:
Ensure the program is well-managed:
Ensure strong, everyday operations:
Ensure program quality and effectiveness:
Mentoring:
Mentoring is a structured and trusting relationship that brings young people together with caring individuals who offer guidance, support and encouragement aimed at developing the competence and character of the mentee.
Types of Mentoring:
Responsible mentoring can take many forms: traditional mentoring (one adult to one young person); group mentoring (one adult to up to four young people); team mentoring (several adults working with small groups of young people, in which the adult to youth ratio is not greater than 1:4); peer mentoring (caring youth mentoring other youth); and e-mentoring (mentoring via e-mail and the Internet).
Locations of Mentoring:
Mentoring can take place in a wide array of settings, such as, at a workplace, in a school, at a faith-based organization, at a juvenile corrections facility, in a community setting and in the "virtual community," where e-mentoring takes place.
Duration of Mentoring:
Because relationships and a sense of bonding occur over time, the duration and consistency of a mentoring relationship is very important. At a minimum, mentors and mentees should meet regularly at least four hours per month for at least a year. There are exceptions, such as, school-based mentoring, which coincide with the school year and other types of special mentoring initiatives. In such special circumstances, mentees need to know from the outset how long they can expect the relationship to last so they can adjust their expectations accordingly.
Source: Jean E. Rhodes, Ph.D., Stand by Me: The Risks and Rewards of Mentoring Today's Youth. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2002.)
Rosemary Townsend
Baylor University Community Partnerships
Sandy Maskell
Big Brothers Big Sisters of America
Marilyn W. Smith, Ph.D.
Communities In Schools, Inc.
Susan K. Patrick
The Connecticut Mentoring Partnership
Dave Van Patten
Dare Mighty Things, Inc.
Mary McCarthy
Everybody Wins! USA
Lynda Downes
The Greater Philadelphia Church Mentoring Network
The Greater Philadelphia Mentoring Partnership at United Way of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Deborah Knight-Kerr
Johns Hopkins Hospital Youth Mentoring
Liza Bray
Los Angeles Team Mentoring, Inc.
Susan G. Weinberger, Ed.D.
Mentor Consulting Group
Chair, MENTOR Public Policy Council
DeVone L. Boggan
The Mentoring Center
Kari Davis
The Mentoring Partnership of Minnesota
Jay Smink, D.Ed.
National Dropout Prevention Center
Ann E. Ensinger
New York City Department of Education
DeEtta Merritt
TeamMates Mentoring Program
Jayme Marshall
United States Department of Justice
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Jean Rhodes, Ph.D.
The University of Massachusetts Boston
Mim Wilkey
Wichita YMCA/Kansas Enrichment Network
Sandi Hackman
YouthFriends
Tonya T. Wiley
MENTOR/National Mentoring Partnership
All Our Kids, Inc.
AOL Time Warner
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Virginia
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Colorado
California Mentor Foundation
Child Welfare League of America
Ernst & Young, LLP
Friends of the Children
Home Box Office
Iowa Mentoring Partnership
Maine Mentoring Partnership
Maryland Mentoring Partnership
MDP Strategies
Memphis Mentoring Partnership
Mentoring Partnership of Long Island
The Mentoring Partnership of New York
National Child Labor Committee
NetMentors.Org
Nonprofit Risk Management Center
New York State Council on Children and Families
Rhode Island Mentoring Partnership
Saito Consulting
Save the Children
Texas Governor's Mentoring Initiative
U.S. Dream Academy, Inc.
United States Department of Education
United Way of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Virginia Mentoring Partnership
Wisconsin Mentoring Coordination Council
Youth Development Strategies, Inc
Home | MEDIA CORNER | CAREERS | Donate/Support Us | SITE MAP | Contact Us | Mentor Store
© 2008 MENTOR | Questions? Problems with the site? | Privacy Policy | Reprint Our Articles